TechNews

Why do most of the test automation projects fail?

1. People don’t know what to automate (and what not to automate).

It’s important to understand what you’re automating and what you’re not automating.

Let’s say you have a webpage. Automating various functions of a web page is a good thing, but using test automation to check for rendering issues or the placement of elements on a page is a bad idea. This is because different devices, browsers, and screen sizes make it difficult to know how the screen will look in different aspect ratios. Also, if you start using x, and y coordinates to determine the position of elements on the page, running on different screen sizes and resolutions can make your tests choppy. These scenarios are best tested manually by human testers.

Always want to automate things that are reliable, immutable, require multiple iterations, or help save valuable testing effort. Testers can automate routine and repetitive tasks to perform exploratory testing using Useful Testing Tasks.

2. There are no qualified people on the team.

Automation the right way requires some technical expertise from the tester. That said, acquiring a skilled workforce with sufficient technical knowledge can be costly and time-consuming. Few companies, such as start-ups, can afford to hire automation engineers.

It costs money to start an Automation testing services project and hire a skills tester that you can train to automate other members of your team. If that’s not possible, you can always invest in tools that anyone, regardless of technical expertise, can automate.

3. Automation is not well known

You will often see teams of 2-5 people working on automation, but others don’t know how the automation is going. You will miss this lack of visibility because no one takes your work seriously, especially if you can’t tell people how your efforts can help you solve testing problems and bring value.

Fortunately, there are a few easy ways to visualize automation.

Create an automation wiki page that contains information on how to configure your automated features, target modules, and automation frameworks.

View automation results across your team via email notifications and dashboards, and discuss the progress of your daily standups and other team meetings.

After lunch, you will learn a session covering various trends, best practices, and tools related to Automation testing services.

It’s important to co-create the test automation company and involve the whole team in the planning and writing.

4. Application testing is not easy.

Teams usually don’t focus on software testability. What does it mean? When you build your application, you also need to ensure that it can be easily tested at the unit, system, integration, and acceptance levels.

Ignoring this aspect makes the application almost impossible to test at any level. Then I thought the automation wasn’t working for the team. The real problem was that some developers were creating applications that were too complex to test.

Before you begin feature development, discuss the testability of stories, features, and requirements in backlog cleanup and sprint planning meetings. This helps avoid issues later in the development lifecycle.

5. Fuzzy Automated Objects

Our goal is to create a robust automation framework that seamlessly integrates into your CI/CD pipeline, is maintainable, operates reliably and consistently, and provides rapid feedback on your applications. All of these goals are great on paper, but to reach that maturity, you need to start small.

This is where most automation projects fail. If you start complex tasks with automation and cannot get the values ​​you need from the framework, you will have to refactor the whole framework. As a result, time, money, and effort are wasted.

Start by identifying two or three stable high-level functions, then automate them first. From there, Many gather feedback on what works and what doesn’t. Then, once those tests are running consistently and reliably, Many start identifying other tests to add.

It is also important to divide the Automation testing company suite into smoke tests and regression tests. A smoke test is a test that runs after all code saves. For fast feedback on new code changes, it should typically run within 5 minutes. The regression test suite can be run every day and covers different features of your application testing. Your needs may vary depending on your project context, but this is a good approach for me.

6. The team does not have adequate processes to manage automation tasks.

This is one of the most common problems in test Automation testing companies. There is no proper process to handle the automation task. Each team member has a unique interpretation of the process, which leads to confusion and failed automation projects.

The automation process should be simplified and clearly defined from start to finish of the story lifecycle. In the software development life cycle, there should be no ambiguity about who should do what and when. Think of automated tasks as individual stories, such as how to implement different features within a story. This allows the team to respect and manage the automated tasks. Finally, write your procedures as a list of stories on a whiteboard to show the process to your entire team, and remind your team of these steps during daily standups and other team meetings.

Keeping these common reasons for failure in mind can help your team actively avoid them when implementing automation efforts.

Author BIO

Kamal Singh is a Digital Marketing Manager at Devstringx Technologies, a pioneer in Independent software testing services Globally. Kamal has a keen interest in marketing, technology, and new innovations. He likes traveling and sharing his knowledge through his content. He also loves blogging and he posts regularly about technologies, marketing, and new innovations from the past 2 years.

Shares:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *